Web TheFuselage.com

View Full Version : no mystery here


_Nik_
11-11-2005, 08:00 AM
hi, not read any new posts today, so i apologise if im repeating any 1, but when browsing yesterday i saw that alot of people thought ana did not kill shannon. i was hoping this was true, as i hate ana anyway, however......

at the end, where she gets shot, it shows sayid's face looking at her, her face looking at him, the it shows mike sawyer and jin's faces all in shock, wait for it, looking at shannon. i dont realy understand y there was such confusion about this, as it was absolutly obvious

gator402
11-11-2005, 09:15 AM
When they were in the tent the first time she saw walt sayid put his gun down then walt appeared and there was no scene showing the gun picked up, Walt could have took it and so later when shannon sees Walt and runs after him we hear a shot but no one sees Ana shoot her so it's possible Walt shot her

Claire_littleton
11-11-2005, 09:23 AM
-sighs- No, I believe Ana-Lucia did it. Did you see the look on her face? She knew she had done something wrong, seeing as she knew right when she saw Sayid that these people were part of Michael, Jin and Sawyer's group.

Ana-Lucia's face was basically saying "Oh crap. That wasn't an Other. I've made a terrible mistake." But Sayid doesn't think it was and I'm glad he doesn't. He can take his revenge on her for me. -nods- But yes, Walt has no reason to shoot Shannon, and really, I don't believe that /is/ Walt. It's probably just a vision or something and it simply got passed onto Sayid because.. -shrug- I don't know. Maybe because he was the one person with Shannon right before she died.

Either way, it totally was Ana-Lucia. If it was something else, don't you think it would simply shoot Ana-Lucia, Libby, Eko, Bernard, Jin and Michael while they were facing Sayid? I don't say Sawyer cause he's unconiscous.. -shrug- Heck, they might as well have shot him too if it wasn't Ana-Lucia.

bstevens74
11-11-2005, 04:22 PM
While I think it is great that people want to analyze and figure out the mysteries of the show, there is such a thing as going too far. Walt shooting her? After trying to warn her? I don't think so. Sometimes things are exactly what they seem.

Dino 23F
11-11-2005, 04:26 PM
While I think it is great that people want to analyze and figure out the mysteries of the show, there is such a thing as going too far. Walt shooting her? After trying to warn her? I don't think so. Sometimes things are exactly what they seem.


that is awfully silly, and this is the first time i heard this wocko theory, walt was definitly warning her not trying to get her killed, or kill her

bstevens74
11-11-2005, 04:30 PM
that is awfully silly, and this is the first time i heard this wocko theory, walt was definitly warning her not trying to get her killed, or kill her

That's what I meant - why would he warn her and then kill her? It wasn't a theory.

LostMyMarbles
11-11-2005, 04:38 PM
Nevertheless, there's something funny about the obvious attention drawn to the gun in Sayid's pants in the love shack. Remember Chekov's admonition: If you see a gun above the mantel in Act I, it must be fired by Act III.

But where they're going with this (if anywhere), I can't figure out.